Google, M.D. indeed. “Where does this lead us? Are we physicians no longer needed? Is an observer who can accurately select the findings to be entered in a Google search all we need for a diagnosis to appear, as if by magic? The cases presented at clinicopathological conferences can be solved easily; no longer must the discussant talk at length about the differential diagnosis of fever with bradycardia. Even worse, the Google diagnostician might be linked to an evidence-based medicine database, so a computer could e-mail the prescription to the e-druggist with no human involvement needed. The education of house staff is morphing into computer-search techniques. Surely this is a trend to watch.” (via Medpundit)
Real physician voices, twice a week
Free, and one click to unsubscribe.
Keep reading
The Podcast
Listen on Apple · Spotify · YouTube
Latest episodes
Most popular

Alzheimer’s treatment works best early, so why are patients waiting?

Doctors can spot a failing patient. Can they spot a failing hospital?

Clinical trials answer drug questions. Health questions need other tools.

Changing careers in medicine? Ask yourself, not everyone else

Doctor or nurse? The hospital assumptions that put patients at risk

Why PCOS may start in the brain, not the ovary

Is your clinical AI tool safe? 4 questions to ask first
