Some are advocating “Medicare for all”, partly because of the low-interference such a system will provide. Can this stay true in the future?
As Medicare expenditures rise, this illusion of non-interference will become much harder to maintain and indeed Medicare itself may become less popular. I am always curious to hear — from single-payer proponents — which interest groups they think will have a decisive say over the system, and how those interest groups differ in America vs. Western Europe.
(via Health Care Renewal)







![Insulin resistance is a survival mechanism, not a broken system [PODCAST]](https://kevinmd.com/wp-content/uploads/f0ec64bb-ddab-408b-9ef4-106f63883b83-190x100.jpeg)




![Politics and fear have replaced science in U.S. pain management [PODCAST]](https://kevinmd.com/wp-content/uploads/11c2db8f-2b20-4a4d-81cc-083ae0f47d6e-190x100.jpeg)






