Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The ethical breach surrounding the first test tube baby

Peter Ubel, MD
Physician
February 22, 2013
Share
Tweet
Share

The first test tube baby was born July 25th, 1978 in the north of England.  Louise Brown was called the “baby of the century” by some and a “moral abomination” by others.  It wasn’t Brown who critics accused of being immoral, of course.  She was just a blameless infant.  Instead, it was her doctors who came under fire for their new fertility treatment—in vitro fertilization (or IVF).  Roman Catholic theologians characterized this treatment as “unnatural”.  Bioethicists fretted about the risk such treatments posed for mothers and children.

But all these critics of IVF missed the true immorality behind Louise Brown’s birth.  Brown’s doctors never told her mother that IVF was a brand new procedure!

The uproar at the time of Louise Brown’s birth was understandable.  This was a brand new way of having a baby after all.  The baby was not conceived inside Brown’s womb.  The unnaturalness of this procedure was scary for many people.  And the fact that the baby would begin in a test tube, an environment very different than inside a woman’s body, raised all kinds of understandable fears about what this would do to the developing fetus.  Within a decade, the medical facts about IVF relieved most people’s fears about the safety of the procedure.  IVF gained moral acceptance too, even from most practicing Roman Catholics.  (It has become a bit like birth control—accepted by the flock, pilloried by the shepherds.)  But with the death this year of Lesley Brown, Louise’s mother, I came to learn about the actual immorality surrounding the birth of the first test tube baby.  I discovered that Brown was never told that she was undergoing an experimental treatment.

As described recently in the New York Times Magazine , Brown’s gynecologist was a man named Patrick Steptoe.  Brown had come to him because her fallopian tubes were blocked, preventing her from becoming pregnant.  An earlier surgery had failed to unblock the tubes, but she was still hoping to find a way to have her own child.  Steptoe explained that Brown could still have a baby if she wanted to undergo what he called “an implant.”  She agreed to undergo the procedure without any awareness that the treatment was both experimental and unprecedented.

She decided to go ahead with the implant without any idea that the risks and benefits of the procedure were unknown to her and to her baby.

And of course she went along with Steptoe’s recommendation completely unaware that she and her baby (if the procedure worked!) would be thrust into the center of an international media maelstrom.

By 1977, when Brown and Steptoe (oh so briefly) discussed whether to proceed with the procedure, medical experts had already reached a consensus that physicians need to inform patients about the risks and benefits of treatments before making treatment choices.  Indeed, common sense and common decency would have demanded better disclosure of the novelty of this treatment.  It’s hard to fathom the level of … of arrogance? of ambition? … that would have blinded Steptoe to his moral duty to inform Brown about the enormous uncertainty surrounding the new procedure.

Indeed, medical practitioners had already become familiar with a series of atrocities at the hands of ambitious medical researchers.  I tell some of these stories in my book Critical Decisions, stories of physicians injecting unsuspecting patients with hepatitis viruses—and even cancer cells!—to learn more about the “natural history” of these diseases.  But many of these cases occurred decades earlier than Brown’s pregnancy, and when details of these cases came to light, medical practitioners were duly warned that they should not experiment in patients without their patients’ informed consent.

IVF was controversial in 1978 because it was a newfangled, high tech treatment: one that further separated procreation from the, um, procreative act, and one that hinted at a science fiction-like future where babies could be grown outside a mother’s womb.

Interesting to learn in retrospect that the real ethical breach surrounding the first test tube baby was a good old fashioned failure to achieve informed consent.

Peter Ubel is a physician and behavioral scientist who blogs at his self-titled site, Peter Ubel and can be reached on Twitter @PeterUbel.  He is the author of Critical Decisions: How You and Your Doctor Can Make the Right Medical Choices Together.

Prev

Filling out a death certificate: A better way is needed

February 22, 2013 Kevin 9
…
Next

Why the American problem with opioids and chronic pain is here to stay

February 22, 2013 Kevin 42
…

Tagged as: OB/GYN

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Filling out a death certificate: A better way is needed
Next Post >
Why the American problem with opioids and chronic pain is here to stay

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Peter Ubel, MD

  • Clinicians shouldn’t be punished for taking care of needy populations

    Peter Ubel, MD
  • Patients alone cannot combat high health care prices

    Peter Ubel, MD
  • Is the FDA too slow to handle the pandemic?

    Peter Ubel, MD

More in Physician

  • Why judgment is hurting doctors—and how mindfulness can heal

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • Why evidence-based management may be an effective strategy for stronger health care leadership and equity

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • The gift we keep giving: How medicine demands everything—even our holidays

    Tomi Mitchell, MD
  • From burnout to balance: a neurosurgeon’s bold career redesign

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • Why working in Hawai’i health care isn’t all paradise

    Clayton Foster, MD
  • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • 5 blind spots that stall physician wealth

      Johnny Medina, MSc | Finance
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Why judgment is hurting doctors—and how mindfulness can heal

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why medical schools must ditch lectures and embrace active learning

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Education
    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • Why evidence-based management may be an effective strategy for stronger health care leadership and equity

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 3 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • 5 blind spots that stall physician wealth

      Johnny Medina, MSc | Finance
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Why judgment is hurting doctors—and how mindfulness can heal

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why medical schools must ditch lectures and embrace active learning

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Education
    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • Why evidence-based management may be an effective strategy for stronger health care leadership and equity

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The ethical breach surrounding the first test tube baby
3 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...