Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

How an annual physical combined with unnecessary testing doesn’t help

Samuel Harrington, MD
Physician
February 26, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share

An excerpt from At Peace: Choosing a Good Death After a Long Life. Copyright © 2018 by Samuel Harrington, MD. Reprinted with permission of Grand Central Publishing. All rights reserved.

Some would argue that more care for the elderly is better. They are sicker. They are weaker. We must fine-tune their care. We must examine them more closely.

A group of my colleagues made the bulk of their income by doing comprehensive annual physical exams. The yearly physical exam was part of the foundation of medical care when I began my practice. Since the 1990s it has been discredited as beneficial, but has lost little traction in practice. Studies show that the annual physical and its associated tests inflate cost and do not reduce morbidity and mortality. This fact is lost on the general public and ignored by those physicians performing “executive physicals.”

Here is an example of how an annual physical combined with unnecessary testing does harm, or at best, no good. Several years before leaving practice, I met a charming eighty-year-old woman, who lived with her equally charming, but more debilitated, sister. At the time of her annual physical exam, her diligent internist found her to have a slightly low blood count and a trace of blood in her stool. The low level of her blood count is a common, usually harmless, finding in the elderly. However, her internist referred her with the expectation that I would proceed with scope tests of her colon and stomach to exclude a potentially serious disease.

I talked the patient out of a colonoscopy. She had undergone such an exam by another practitioner within the last ten years and had probably maximized her (statistical) benefit at that point. I feared that the preparation would be very stressful and probably suboptimal.

We settled on an upper endoscopy to rule out benign blood-losing lesions and hoped that we did not find an unsuspected gastric malignancy. Unfortunately for her, I found a medium-size, flat, and benign growth on the inner curve of her duodenum (small intestine). Biopsies proved it to have pre-cancer potential. My bias, which I explained to her as both my professional opinion and a biased opinion, was to leave well enough alone. The lesion was at risk to grow and bleed, but it was a small risk. To manage it aggressively (that means to cut it out) would have required surgery (too aggressive at her age) or serial endoscopies to remove it piecemeal (the current standard of care). Each endoscopy would carry the small but cumulative risk of bleeding, perforation, anesthesia, and other complications. Given her age, it probably would best be managed through benign neglect.

A triangulated conversation with the referring physician resulted in a second opinion with an aggressive academic endoscopist. The patient underwent serial endoscopies, and ultimately the lesion was removed without serious complication, although the frequent outpatient trips put stress on her sister and ended when the sister fell in the hospital and fractured her pelvis. They had learned a lesson and wisely refused the recommendations of the academic endoscopist for regular follow-up examinations to monitor for a possible recurrence.

It is clear that the only one who definitely benefitted from this treatment plan was the other endoscopist.

As I matured as a gastroenterologist, I began to see that most doctors and patients envisioned no end to the usefulness of screening exams and associated testing. When to start screening and when to end screening are fundamental questions that medical science should be refining and redefining on a regular basis, but practitioners and patients resist any limitations. It was instinctively clear to me that some age existed after which screening did more harm than good.

During the last five years of my practice, I was regularly turning people away who were referred for a screening colonoscopy. I advised them that a preemptive exam was unlikely to help them and might harm them. The vast majority of patients left the office saying, “Thanks, Doc, I like that advice. I will call you if I have a symptom.”

Samuel Harrington is a gastroenterologist and author of At Peace: Choosing a Good Death After a Long Life.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

The year of the woman physician

February 26, 2018 Kevin 31
…
Next

Fixation error can be deadly in medicine

February 26, 2018 Kevin 0
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: Gastroenterology, Oncology/Hematology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The year of the woman physician
Next Post >
Fixation error can be deadly in medicine

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Samuel Harrington, MD

  • Sepsis awareness: Should there be different awareness goals for the young and the old?

    Samuel Harrington, MD
  • An aging physician muses on end-of-life care

    Samuel Harrington, MD
  • The momentum to treat in America is unmatched around the globe

    Samuel Harrington, MD

Related Posts

  • Improving physician satisfaction by eliminating unnecessary practice burdens

    Yul Ejnes, MD
  • Physicians are trapped between patient satisfaction and unnecessary prescribing

    Richard Young, MD
  • The emotional side of genetic testing

    Erin Paterson
  • A patient’s perspective on genetic testing

    Erin Paterson
  • Do uninsured patients receive more unnecessary care?

    Peter Ubel, MD
  • How physical should medical training be?

    Orly Farber

More in Physician

  • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • How a $75 million jet brought down America’s boldest doctor

    Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA
  • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

    Pamela Adelstein, MD
  • When rock bottom is a turning point: Why the turmoil at HHS may be a blessing in disguise

    Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD
  • How grief transformed a psychiatrist’s approach to patient care

    Devina Maya Wadhwa, MD
  • Fear of other people’s opinions nearly killed me. Here’s what freed me.

    Jillian Rigert, MD, DMD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

      Pamela Adelstein, MD | Physician
    • A world without antidepressants: What could possibly go wrong?

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Meds
    • Rethinking patient payments: Why billing is the new frontline of patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
  • Recent Posts

    • What prostate cancer taught this physician about being a patient

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Conditions
    • Why fearing AI is really about fearing ourselves

      Bhargav Raman, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why great patient outcomes don’t protect female doctors from burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why ADHD in women is finally getting the attention it deserves

      Arti Lal, MD | Conditions
    • How a $75 million jet brought down America’s boldest doctor

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

      Pamela Adelstein, MD | Physician
    • A world without antidepressants: What could possibly go wrong?

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Meds
    • Rethinking patient payments: Why billing is the new frontline of patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
  • Recent Posts

    • What prostate cancer taught this physician about being a patient

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Conditions
    • Why fearing AI is really about fearing ourselves

      Bhargav Raman, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why great patient outcomes don’t protect female doctors from burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why ADHD in women is finally getting the attention it deserves

      Arti Lal, MD | Conditions
    • How a $75 million jet brought down America’s boldest doctor

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

How an annual physical combined with unnecessary testing doesn’t help
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...