Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

How corporate greed and politics are destroying health care

M. Bennet Broner, PhD
Policy
March 26, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

In past decades, physicians practiced medicine. The majority were dedicated to patient well-being. They were paternalistic and decided what was in their patients’ best interests, and patients generally trusted their judgments. In the 1970s, ethicists concluded that patients and clinicians should make treatment decisions jointly. This position has been championed since then, despite multiple surveys demonstrating that more than 50 percent of patients prefer their physicians to be the decision-makers. Additionally, over 80 percent of individuals have difficulty making rational judgments about their care.

Given the realities of present-day practice, clinicians neither have the time to motivate nor educate patients to enable them to be partners, nor, in my opinion, should this be their responsibility. Health educators could assist in these activities, but patients must be motivated to learn, to set aside established beliefs, and to accept contradictory information. This process can be arduous for many people, as the expectation of a desired outcome can blind them to other possibilities.

More significantly, clinicians’ ability to practice largely unfettered has been co-opted by for-profit executives and politicians, neither of whom is patient-oriented. It was not anticipated that medical care would be discovered as immensely profitable and that mercantile entities would purchase an ever-increasing market share. Executives are driven by expanding earnings and manipulate the health care system, legally and illegally, to achieve this goal, increasingly compromising patient safety and life.

Multiple recent studies, for example, have noted that when a hospital becomes profit-oriented, both staff and salaries are reduced, and when physician practices become for-profit, prices are increased, and patient visit times are decreased. One Medicare Advantage insurance company enthusiastically reported a 52 percent increase in profit for 2024 yet is requesting greater Medicare reimbursement, claiming that their profit margin was less than expected. Another company offered physicians $10,000 bonuses to increase the number of patient diagnoses not requiring treatment because the government paid more for “complex” patients.

Prior authorizations (PAs) have received much bad publicity lately, but their present use is not why they were created. Medicare developed PAs with two goals: to ensure patients received care that followed “best practices” and to slow rising costs. Health insurers quickly adopted them to control payment and increase revenue.

Sometimes, profit-oriented hospital administrators have required patients to prepay surgical bills, even when they are insured, to save themselves any future cost of haggling with an insurer. Will credit reports soon be accessed before emergency treatment and care based on one’s score? One hospital denies patient discharge until it receives a written guarantee of payment by insurance or, if the patient is uninsured, a full cash payment.

Also unexpected was that medical care would become politicized and used by federal and state legislators to favor individual beliefs and benefactors rather than patient health. Many proposed bills lack a scientific basis, defy common sense, and are contrary to the desires of the majority of their constituents. They are poorly written, broadly constructed, and obtuse.

The six-week fetal heartbeat laws are exemplary, as embryologically, the heart is not developed at this age, the “heartbeat” arises from a different structure, and the fetus’s circulation comes from the mother’s circulatory system via the umbilical cord until birth, not from its heart. In their eagerness to curtail surgeries for trans-individuals, Florida legislators passed a law so vague that a surgeon could be imprisoned for removing cancerous reproductive organs. Not to be outdone, Ohio legislators decided that hospitalized COVID-19 patients can request Ivermectin, though ineffective, and its non-provision would result in incarceration! Of whom was not indicated.

Legislators who composed the six-week abortion laws contend they are lucidly written and easy to understand. If so, why do physicians and attorneys have great difficulty interpreting them when confronted with pregnant females* with a life-threatening crisis? Or, when it was pointed out to the lawmaker who originated the Florida law that he had banned mastectomies and prostatectomies for cancer, he did nothing to exempt these and similar procedures from his bill. These legislators did not expect or seem to care that their actions would result in a long-term diminution of physicians practicing in their states, reducing quality care for all citizens.

RFK Jr. doggedly believes that vaccinations cause more harm than good and insists that poor studies in low-quality journals outweigh decades of reputable research. In some states, physicians have been coerced into drug testing pregnant females and reporting those with positive results to law enforcement. Texas Governor Abbott has threatened the loss of state funding to hospitals that do not demand proof of citizenship at admission. In other states, an attorney general wants to deny medical care to “birthright” individuals he considers to have invalid citizenship in violation of the Constitution, while another wants a directory of pregnant women he believes might seek abortions, without defining whom these women may be. Will these unreasoning regulations result in people avoiding care for life-threatening or communicable conditions?

At what point does medicine become wholly manipulated for political or monetary gain? I support reasonable regulation and profit, but the primary purpose of health care must be patient benefit and safety, not ideology, political advantage, or lucre.

* “Pregnant person” is a social construct but biologically inaccurate as pregnancy and childbirth require functional female reproductive organs, regardless of the sex or gender one chooses to be.

M. Bennet Broner is a medical ethicist.

ADVERTISEMENT

Prev

The silent grief of vanishing twin syndrome: Why words matter in health care

March 26, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

Why doctors love AI scribes—and the risks they bring [PODCAST]

March 26, 2025 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: OB/GYN

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The silent grief of vanishing twin syndrome: Why words matter in health care
Next Post >
Why doctors love AI scribes—and the risks they bring [PODCAST]

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by M. Bennet Broner, PhD

  • Patient choice vs. patient life: Which is the greater good?

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • How unclaimed bodies are fueling a medical ethics firestorm

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • Are new blood tests for Alzheimer’s and cancer worth the hype?

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD

Related Posts

  • Politics is health care on a grand scale

    Kasey Johnson, DO
  • Chainsaw politics may cut deeply into the fabric of health care

    Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA
  • Doctors and patients continue to search through the overgrown forest of corporate health care

    Michele Luckenbaugh
  • Why the health care industry must prioritize health equity

    George T. Mathew, MD, MBA
  • Proactive care is the linchpin for saving America’s health care system

    Ronald A. Paulus, MD, MBA
  • Health care workers should not be targets

    Lori E. Johnson

More in Policy

  • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

    Michael Misialek, MD
  • Conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies

    Martha Rosenberg
  • When America sneezes, the world catches a cold: Trump’s freeze on HIV/AIDS funding

    Koketso Masenya
  • A surgeon’s late-night crisis reveals the cost confusion in health care

    Christine Ward, MD
  • The school cafeteria could save American medicine

    Scarlett Saitta
  • Native communities deserve better: the truth about Pine Ridge health care

    Kaitlin E. Kelly
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • A world without antidepressants: What could possibly go wrong?

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Meds
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

      Michael Misialek, MD | Policy
    • Why the words doctors use matter more than they think

      Erin Paterson | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • How the CDC’s opioid rules created a crisis for chronic pain patients

      Charles LeBaron, MD | Conditions
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
  • Recent Posts

    • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

      Michael Misialek, MD | Policy
    • Venous leak syndrome: a silent challenge faced by all men

      Elliot Justin, MD | Conditions
    • Rethinking patient payments: Why billing is the new frontline of patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

      Pamela Adelstein, MD | Physician
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • Reimagining diabetes care with nutrition, not prescriptions

      William Hsu, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • A world without antidepressants: What could possibly go wrong?

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Meds
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

      Michael Misialek, MD | Policy
    • Why the words doctors use matter more than they think

      Erin Paterson | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • How the CDC’s opioid rules created a crisis for chronic pain patients

      Charles LeBaron, MD | Conditions
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
  • Recent Posts

    • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

      Michael Misialek, MD | Policy
    • Venous leak syndrome: a silent challenge faced by all men

      Elliot Justin, MD | Conditions
    • Rethinking patient payments: Why billing is the new frontline of patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

      Pamela Adelstein, MD | Physician
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • Reimagining diabetes care with nutrition, not prescriptions

      William Hsu, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...