I have spent decades in health care. I know how much physicians rely on clinical judgment, pattern recognition, and experience. Those skills matter, and they also carry a risk: The human brain is constantly filling in gaps, and sometimes the story we create about a patient can become more powerful than the information the patient is trying to give us.
I experienced this recently during a telehealth visit with a physician who was evaluating my functioning. During the appointment, he described me using words like “smart,” “articulate,” “attractive,” “charming,” “well groomed,” and “fashionable.” His documentation reflected some of that impression. He noted that I was wearing sunglasses in my car during the visit. He interpreted my appearance as evidence of being well-groomed and put together.
But what he saw was not the whole picture. I was wearing a simple pink T-shirt. My hair was in a messy ponytail. I wasn’t wearing any makeup. I was struggling with my own insecurities about my appearance, including hair loss. And I was wearing sunglasses so that I wouldn’t have to squint. The image he formed of me was not the reality I was experiencing internally.
More importantly, the qualities he admired became intertwined with his assessment of my limitations. This is where the halo effect becomes dangerous in medicine, because intelligence does not eliminate disability. A person can be “articulate” and pleasant and insightful and still struggle with daily functioning.
What concerned me most was not that the physician had a positive impression of me. The problem was that his positive impression competed with my own report of my limitations.
I was trying to explain what I could no longer do. I was trying to describe changes in my functioning, my symptoms, and the impact those symptoms have on my ability to work. Instead, the conversation became a conflict between his belief about who I was and my own knowledge of what I was experiencing.
He saw potential. I was describing impairment. Both things can exist at the same time. A patient does not stop being capable, intelligent, or valuable because their body or nervous system can no longer meet the demands it once did.
There is also a gendered dimension to this experience that deserves discussion. As a woman, I have noticed a recurring dynamic when interacting with certain male authority figures. When I speak directly, confidently, and without intimidation (as an equal, because I am one), my confidence can become the subject of attention rather than the information I am trying to convey. The focus shifts from what I am saying to how I am saying it, and my assertiveness becomes something to interpret or admire rather than a legitimate way of communicating.
A woman who is assertive can be perceived as unusually impressive, intimidating, or exceptional. But admiration can become another form of not seeing.
The “exceptional woman” narrative can be just as limiting as negative stereotypes. It creates pressure to be endlessly competent, resilient, and capable. It can make vulnerability harder to recognize.
In medicine, this matters because the patient is not there to fulfill a narrative. The patient is not a contradiction to be solved: “She seems too intelligent to be disabled.” “She seems too confident to be struggling.” “She seems too put together to have limitations.” The patient is the source of information about their own lived experience.
A physician’s role is not to decide whether a patient’s suffering fits the image they have created. It is to investigate, document, and understand. A person can be extraordinary and impaired, talented and exhausted, attractive and in pain.
The most dangerous thing a clinician can do is mistake a patient’s strengths for evidence that their limitations are not real. A patient’s strengths should never become evidence against their suffering.
Harm occurs when a clinician’s perception of a patient becomes more influential than the patient’s own account of their functioning. Patients need to be believed. And doctors need to believe them.
Natalia Eden is a nurse.



















