Maggie Mahar: “These are not decisions for politicians. Public health experts and medical researchers should make the judgment, based on community needs and medical evidence as to the benefits of the new technology.”
Expensive diagnostic equipment
ADVERTISEMENT
More in Uncategorized
Past Week
-
The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy
-
Nuclear verdicts and rising costs: How inflation is reshaping medical malpractice claims
-
How new loan caps could destroy diversity in medical education
-
IMGs are the future of U.S. primary care
-
From nurse practitioner to leader in quality improvement [PODCAST]
-
The crushing bureaucracy that’s driving independent physicians to extinction
-
Past 6 Months
-
Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action
-
How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis
-
Why primary care needs better dermatology training
-
New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine
-
Why pain doctors face unfair scrutiny and harsh penalties in California
-
Love, birds, and fries: a story of innocence and connection
-
Recent Posts
-
Creating safe, authentic group experiences
-
The diseconomics of scale: How Indian pharma’s race to scale backfires on U.S. patients
-
Healing from medical training by learning to trust your body again [PODCAST]
-
How tragedy shaped a medical career
-
A doctor’s guide to preparing for your death
-
Coconut oil’s role in Alzheimer’s and depression
-
Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!
Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.
