Maggie Mahar: “These are not decisions for politicians. Public health experts and medical researchers should make the judgment, based on community needs and medical evidence as to the benefits of the new technology.”
Expensive diagnostic equipment
ADVERTISEMENT
More in Uncategorized
Past Week
-
Alex Pretti: a physician’s open letter defending his legacy
-
The elephant in the room: Why physician burnout is a relationship problem
-
ADHD and cannabis use: Navigating the diagnostic challenge
-
Leading with love: a physician’s guide to clarity and compassion
-
Urological analysis of delayed cancer diagnoses in political figures [PODCAST]
-
The economics of prevention: Why an ounce is worth a pound
-
Past 6 Months
-
Why patient trust in physicians is declining
-
Physician on-call compensation: the unpaid labor driving burnout
-
How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change
-
Will AI replace primary care physicians?
-
A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights
-
Is tramadol really ineffective and risky?
-
Recent Posts
-
Clinical attachment in medicine: How familiarity creates safety
-
Racial disparities in pancreatic cancer screening cost Black lives [PODCAST]
-
A poem on kidney cancer survivorship and the annual scan
-
AI-enabled clinical data abstraction: a nurse’s perspective
-
Why clinical excellence isn’t enough to sustain a physician-owned hospital
-
Emergency department metrics vs. reality: Why the numbers lie
-
Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!
Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.
